AMD A4-7300 vs AMD A10-7800

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-7300 and AMD A10-7800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-7300

• Around 3% higher clock speed: 4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1480 vs 1458
• 12.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.365 vs 0.668

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-7800

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• Around 2% higher maximum core temperature: 71.30°C vs 70°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• 2.7x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3215 vs 1534
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 476 vs 442
• 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1390 vs 681
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.473 vs 2.343
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 10.821 vs 4.73
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.18 vs 0.112
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.524 vs 1.865
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1750 vs 502
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1508 vs 1071
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 vs 2652
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1750 vs 502
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1508 vs 1071
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 vs 2652

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-7300
CPU 2: AMD A10-7800

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1480 1458
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1534 3215
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	442 476
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	681 1390
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	2.343 4.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	4.73 10.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	0.112 0.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	8.365 0.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	1.865 4.524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	502 1750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	1071 1508
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	2652 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	502 1750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	1071 1508
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	2652 3316

Compare specifications (specs)