AMD A4-7300 versus AMD A10-7800
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A4-7300 et AMD A10-7800 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A4-7300
- Environ 3% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4 GHz versus 3.9 GHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1480 versus 1458
- 12.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.365 versus 0.668
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 4 GHz versus 3.9 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1480 versus 1458 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.365 versus 0.668 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-7800
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 2% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 71.30°C versus 70°C
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 28 nm versus 32 nm SOI
- 2.7x plus de la cache L1, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L1 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 4x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3215 versus 1534
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 476 versus 442
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1390 versus 681
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.473 versus 2.343
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 10.821 versus 4.73
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.18 versus 0.112
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.524 versus 1.865
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1750 versus 502
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1508 versus 1071
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 versus 2652
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1750 versus 502
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1508 versus 1071
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 versus 2652
Caractéristiques | |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
Température de noyau maximale | 71.30°C versus 70°C |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 32 nm SOI |
Cache L1 | 256 KB versus 96 KB |
Cache L2 | 4 MB versus 1 MB |
Référence | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3215 versus 1534 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 476 versus 442 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1390 versus 681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.473 versus 2.343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.821 versus 4.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.18 versus 0.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.524 versus 1.865 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1750 versus 502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1508 versus 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 versus 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1750 versus 502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1508 versus 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 versus 2652 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A4-7300
CPU 2: AMD A10-7800
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A4-7300 | AMD A10-7800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1480 | 1458 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1534 | 3215 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 442 | 476 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 681 | 1390 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.343 | 4.473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.73 | 10.821 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.112 | 0.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.365 | 0.668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.865 | 4.524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 502 | 1750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1071 | 1508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2652 | 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 502 | 1750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1071 | 1508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2652 | 3316 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A4-7300 | AMD A10-7800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
OPN Tray | AD7300OKA23HL | AD7800YBI44JA |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2466 | 2076 |
Série | AMD A4-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
OPN PIB | AD7800YBJABOX | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Cache L1 | 96 KB | 256 KB |
Cache L2 | 1 MB | 4 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 32 nm SOI | 28 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 70°C | 71.30°C |
Fréquence maximale | 4 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 4 |
Nombre de fils | 2 | 4 |
Ouvert | ||
Compute Cores | 12 | |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 800 MHz | 720 MHz |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 192 | 512 |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon HD 8470D | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Prise courants soutenu | FM2 | FM2+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |