AMD A6-3400M vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5850
Comparative analysis of AMD A6-3400M and Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3400M
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 10% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1191 vs 687
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 721 vs 430
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 June 2011 vs 1 October 2008 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 2 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1191 vs 687 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 721 vs 430 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T5850
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 34 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 787 vs 691
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 241 vs 232
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 34 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 787 vs 691 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 241 vs 232 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A6-3400M
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T5850
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD A6-3400M | Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 691 | 787 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1191 | 687 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 232 | 241 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 721 | 430 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.336 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.347 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.256 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.05 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.526 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 529 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 529 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A6-3400M | Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Llano | Merom |
Launch date | 15 June 2011 | 1 October 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 2893 | 2936 |
Series | AMD A-Series | Intel Core 2 Duo |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Price now | $15.90 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.13 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 218 mm | |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 2 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 1000 Million | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 667 MHz | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Sockets supported | FS1 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 34 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |