AMD A6-3410MX vs AMD Phenom II X4 P920

Comparative analysis of AMD A6-3410MX and AMD Phenom II X4 P920 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3410MX

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 44% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 736 vs 597
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1270 vs 1006
  • Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.962 vs 1.869
  • 20.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 93.264 vs 4.549
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 14 June 2011 vs 12 May 2010
Maximum frequency 2.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 45 nm
L2 cache 4096 KB vs 2048 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 736 vs 597
PassMark - CPU mark 1270 vs 1006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.962 vs 1.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 93.264 vs 4.549

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 P920

  • Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • 3.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1029 vs 265
  • 3.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2866 vs 800
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1029 vs 265
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 2866 vs 800

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A6-3410MX
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 P920

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
736
597
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1270
1006
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
265
1029
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
800
2866
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.962
1.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
93.264
4.549
Name AMD A6-3410MX AMD Phenom II X4 P920
PassMark - Single thread mark 736 597
PassMark - CPU mark 1270 1006
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 265 1029
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 800 2866
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.962 1.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 93.264 4.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 6.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.741

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD A6-3410MX AMD Phenom II X4 P920

Essentials

Architecture codename Llano Champlain
Launch date 14 June 2011 12 May 2010
Place in performance rating 2712 2745
Series AMD A-Series 4x AMD Phenom II
Vertical segment Laptop Laptop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 218 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 512 KB
L2 cache 4096 KB 2048 KB
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 45 nm
Maximum frequency 2.3 GHz 1.6 GHz
Number of cores 4 4
Number of threads 4 4
Transistor count 1000 Million
Front-side bus (FSB) 3600 MHz

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1
Sockets supported FS1 S1 (S1g4)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

Advanced Technologies

VirusProtect