AMD A6-9400 vs AMD A9-9400 SoC
Comparative analysis of AMD A6-9400 and AMD A9-9400 SoC processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-9400
- CPU is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 154067% higher clock speed: 3700 MHz vs 2.4 GHz
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1664 vs 1195
- 2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2717 vs 1329
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2019 vs May 2016 |
Maximum frequency | 3700 MHz vs 2.4 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1664 vs 1195 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2717 vs 1329 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9400 SoC
- Around 60% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 160 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 1 MB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A6-9400
CPU 2: AMD A9-9400 SoC
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD A6-9400 | AMD A9-9400 SoC |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1664 | 1195 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2717 | 1329 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.759 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 49.738 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.079 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 894 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1799 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5100 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 894 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1799 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5100 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A6-9400 | AMD A9-9400 SoC | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge | Stoney Ridge |
Launch date | 2019 | May 2016 |
OPN Tray | AD9400AGM23AB | |
Place in performance rating | 1551 | 1541 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3400 MHz | |
L1 cache | 160 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1024 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | |
Maximum frequency | 3700 MHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | |
Die size | 124 mm | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Transistor count | 1200 million | |
Memory |
||
ECC memory support | ||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR4-1600, DDR4-2400 | DDR4 |
Graphics |
||
Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | |
Processor graphics | Radeon R5 | |
Compatibility |
||
Sockets supported | AM4 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 10 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |