AMD A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5-6200U
Comparative analysis of AMD A9-9410 and Intel Core i5-6200U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9410
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher clock speed: 3.5 GHz vs 2.80 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10-25/25 Watt vs 15 Watt
- 3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1817 vs 596
- Around 90% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2686 vs 1415
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.735 vs 2.306
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5532 vs 4174
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5532 vs 4174
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2016 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.5 GHz vs 2.80 GHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB vs 512 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10-25/25 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1817 vs 596 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2686 vs 1415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.735 vs 2.306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5532 vs 4174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5532 vs 4174 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-6200U
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1546 vs 1350
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2994 vs 1548
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 19.309 vs 4.731
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.28 vs 0.108
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.135 vs 2.184
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1324 vs 922
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 vs 1061
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1324 vs 922
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 vs 1061
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1546 vs 1350 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2994 vs 1548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.309 vs 4.731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.28 vs 0.108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.135 vs 2.184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1324 vs 922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 vs 1061 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1324 vs 922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 vs 1061 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A9-9410
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-6200U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A9-9410 | Intel Core i5-6200U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1350 | 1546 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1548 | 2994 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1817 | 596 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2686 | 1415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.294 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.731 | 19.309 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.108 | 0.28 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.735 | 2.306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.184 | 7.135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 922 | 1324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1061 | 2479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5532 | 4174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 922 | 1324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1061 | 2479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5532 | 4174 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A9-9410 | Intel Core i5-6200U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Skylake |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2016 | 1 September 2015 |
| OPN Tray | AM9410AFY23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in performance rating | 1742 | 1793 |
| Series | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | |
| Processor Number | i5-6200U | |
| Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.30 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Die size | 124.5 mm | 99 mm |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.5 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1200 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | 1 GHz |
| iGPU core count | 3 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 520 |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x1916 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 32 GB | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | FP4 | FCBGA1356 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10-25/25 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down | 7.5 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 2.40 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 42mm X 24mm | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 8 | 12 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | N / A | |
| Max resolution over WiDi | 1080p | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD A9-9410 with others
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMDPhenom II X2 N640
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCore i7-3517UE
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMDFX-9800P
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCeleron G3900TE
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMDAthlon Silver 3050e
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCeleron J6412
