AMD A9-9410 versus Intel Core i5-6200U
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A9-9410 et Intel Core i5-6200U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Qualité des images graphiques, Sécurité & fiabilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A9-9410
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.5 GHz versus 2.80 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10-25/25 Watt versus 15 Watt
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1817 versus 596
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2686 versus 1415
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.735 versus 2.306
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5532 versus 4174
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5532 versus 4174
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 June 2016 versus 1 September 2015 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.5 GHz versus 2.80 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB versus 512 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10-25/25 Watt versus 15 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1817 versus 596 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2686 versus 1415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.735 versus 2.306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5532 versus 4174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5532 versus 4174 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-6200U
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 11% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 100°C versus 90°C
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1546 versus 1350
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2994 versus 1548
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 19.309 versus 4.731
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.28 versus 0.108
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.135 versus 2.184
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1324 versus 922
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 versus 1061
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1324 versus 922
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 versus 1061
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C versus 90°C |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1546 versus 1350 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2994 versus 1548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.309 versus 4.731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.28 versus 0.108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.135 versus 2.184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1324 versus 922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 versus 1061 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1324 versus 922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 versus 1061 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A9-9410
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-6200U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD A9-9410 | Intel Core i5-6200U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1350 | 1546 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1548 | 2994 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1817 | 596 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2686 | 1415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.294 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.731 | 19.309 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.108 | 0.28 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.735 | 2.306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.184 | 7.135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 922 | 1324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1061 | 2479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5532 | 4174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 922 | 1324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1061 | 2479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5532 | 4174 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD A9-9410 | Intel Core i5-6200U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Stoney Ridge | Skylake |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Date de sortie | 1 June 2016 | 1 September 2015 |
| OPN Tray | AM9410AFY23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1742 | 1793 |
| Série | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $281 | |
| Processor Number | i5-6200U | |
| Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.30 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Taille de dé | 124.5 mm | 99 mm |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 100°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.5 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 1200 Million | |
| Ouvert | ||
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
| Cache L3 | 3 MB | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 34.1 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 800 MHz | 1 GHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 3 | |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 520 |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x1916 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 32 GB | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Prise courants soutenu | FP4 | FCBGA1356 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10-25/25 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down | 7.5 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 2.40 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 42mm X 24mm | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 8 | 12 |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | N / A | |
| Résolution maximale sur WiDi | 1080p | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD A9-9410 avec des autres
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMDPhenom II X2 N640
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCore i7-3517UE
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMDFX-9800P
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCeleron G3900TE
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMDAthlon Silver 3050e
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCeleron J6412
