AMD A9-9425 vs AMD A10-5757M
Comparative analysis of AMD A9-9425 and AMD A10-5757M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9425
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1317 vs 1097
- 5.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2034 vs 365
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3077 vs 901
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.781 vs 2.665
- 11.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 112.324 vs 9.416
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.615 vs 0.561
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.577 vs 13.138
- 18.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.717 vs 2.213
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1317 vs 1097 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2034 vs 365 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3077 vs 901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.781 vs 2.665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.324 vs 9.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.615 vs 0.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.577 vs 13.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.717 vs 2.213 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5757M
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1932 vs 1511
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 987 vs 943
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2108 vs 1243
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7817 vs 3556
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 987 vs 943
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2108 vs 1243
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7817 vs 3556
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1932 vs 1511 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 987 vs 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2108 vs 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7817 vs 3556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 987 vs 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2108 vs 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7817 vs 3556 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A9-9425
CPU 2: AMD A10-5757M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A9-9425 | AMD A10-5757M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1317 | 1097 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1511 | 1932 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2034 | 365 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3077 | 901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.781 | 2.665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.324 | 9.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.615 | 0.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.577 | 13.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.717 | 2.213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 943 | 987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1243 | 2108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3556 | 7817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 943 | 987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1243 | 2108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3556 | 7817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A9-9425 | AMD A10-5757M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Richland |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | 2Q18 | 23 May 2013 |
| OPN Tray | AM9425AYN23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in performance rating | 1496 | 1432 |
| Series | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A-Series |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.1 GHz | |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Die size | 124 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 71 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
| Transistor count | 1200 million | 1178 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Number of threads | 4 | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 900 MHz | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 10-15 Watt | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Sockets supported | BGA | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD A9-9425 with others
AMDA9-9425 vs
AMDA4-9120
AMDA9-9425 vs
AMDRyzen 7 PRO 3700U
AMDA9-9425 vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1305G
AMDA9-9425 vs
IntelCeleron N6211
AMDA9-9425 vs
IntelPentium N6415
AMDA9-9425 vs
IntelPentium J6426
