AMD Athlon 64 2000+ vs AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W)

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 2000+ and AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W) processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 2000+

  • CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • 17.5x lower typical power consumption: 8 Watt vs 140 Watt
Launch date June 2008 vs March 2008
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 8 Watt vs 140 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W)

  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
  • Around 160% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked
Number of cores 4 vs 1
Maximum frequency 2.6 GHz vs 1 GHz
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 2000+
CPU 2: AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W)

Name AMD Athlon 64 2000+ AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W)
PassMark - Single thread mark 130
PassMark - CPU mark 116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 3.494

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Athlon 64 2000+ AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W)

Essentials

Architecture codename Lima Agena
Launch date June 2008 March 2008
Place in performance rating 3309 3295
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 77 mm 285 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 512 KB 512 KB (per core)
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 65 nm
Maximum frequency 1 GHz 2.6 GHz
Number of cores 1 4
Transistor count 122 million 450 million
L3 cache 2048 KB (shared)
Unlocked

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM2 AM2+
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 8 Watt 140 Watt

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)