AMD Athlon 64 2700+ vs AMD Athlon 64 2800+

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 2700+ and AMD Athlon 64 2800+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 2700+

  • 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 89 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 32 Watt vs 89 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 2800+

  • Around 13% higher clock speed: 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 438 vs 398
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 438 vs 398

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 2700+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 2800+

PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
398
438
Name AMD Athlon 64 2700+ AMD Athlon 64 2800+
PassMark - Single thread mark 0 511
PassMark - CPU mark 398 438

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Athlon 64 2700+ AMD Athlon 64 2800+

Essentials

Architecture codename NewCastle NewCastle
Launch date April 2004 April 2004
Place in performance rating 3342 2973
Vertical segment Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $100
Price now $99.99
Value for money (0-100) 1.29

Performance

Die size 144 mm 144 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 512 KB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 130 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 69 million 69 million
64 bit support

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported 754 754
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 32 Watt 89 Watt

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare AMD Athlon 64 2700+ with others

AMD Athlon 64 2700+ AMD
Athlon 64 2700+
vs Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.4E Intel
Pentium 4 HT 3.4E
AMD Athlon 64 2700+ AMD
Athlon 64 2700+
vs AMD Athlon 64 3300+ AMD
Athlon 64 3300+
AMD Athlon 64 2700+ AMD
Athlon 64 2700+
vs AMD Athlon 64 2800+ AMD
Athlon 64 2800+