AMD Athlon 64 2700+ vs AMD Athlon 64 2800+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 2700+ and AMD Athlon 64 2800+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 2700+
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 89 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 89 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 2800+
- Around 13% higher clock speed: 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 438 vs 398
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 438 vs 398 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 2700+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 2800+
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Athlon 64 2700+ | AMD Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 0 | 511 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 398 | 438 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon 64 2700+ | AMD Athlon 64 2800+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | NewCastle | NewCastle |
| Launch date | April 2004 | April 2004 |
| Place in performance rating | 3350 | 2985 |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $100 | |
| Price now | $99.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.29 | |
Performance |
||
| Die size | 144 mm | 144 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 69 million | 69 million |
| 64 bit support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 754 | 754 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt | 89 Watt |
