AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 vs AMD Athlon 64 FX-51
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 and AMD Athlon 64 FX-51 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 FX-53
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 646 vs 437
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | June 2004 vs September 2003 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 646 vs 437 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 FX-53
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 FX-51
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 | AMD Athlon 64 FX-51 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 0 | 0 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 646 | 437 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 | AMD Athlon 64 FX-51 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Clawhammer | SledgeHammer |
| Launch date | June 2004 | September 2003 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | |
| Place in performance rating | 3337 | 3352 |
| Price now | $29.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.36 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 193 mm | 193 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 105 million | 105 million |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 939 | 940 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt | 89 Watt |
