AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 vs AMD Athlon 64 FX-51
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 and AMD Athlon 64 FX-51 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 FX-53
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 646 vs 437
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | June 2004 vs September 2003 |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 646 vs 437 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 FX-53
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 FX-51
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 | AMD Athlon 64 FX-51 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 0 | 0 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 646 | 437 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 | AMD Athlon 64 FX-51 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Clawhammer | SledgeHammer |
Launch date | June 2004 | September 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | |
Place in performance rating | 3329 | 3343 |
Price now | $29.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.36 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 193 mm | 193 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 105 million | 105 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 939 | 940 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt | 89 Watt |