AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600 vs AMD Athlon XP 3200+

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600 and AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600

  • CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 90 nm vs 130 nm
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 71% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 77 Watt
  • Around 47% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 412 vs 281
Specifications (specs)
Launch date October 2007 vs January 2001
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm vs 130 nm
L2 cache 1024 KB vs 512 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 77 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 412 vs 281

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 3200+

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
430
430
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
412
281
Name AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600 AMD Athlon XP 3200+
PassMark - Single thread mark 430 430
PassMark - CPU mark 412 281

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600 AMD Athlon XP 3200+

Essentials

Architecture codename Windsor Barton
Launch date October 2007 January 2001
Place in performance rating 3096 3108
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 230 mm 101 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 2.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 227 million 63 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM2 A
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 77 Watt