AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE vs Intel Core Duo ULV L2400

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE and Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Memory.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE

  • Around 143% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 1.07 GHz
Maximum frequency 2.6 GHz vs 1.07 GHz

Reasons to consider the Intel Core Duo ULV L2400

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 7.2x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 65 Watt
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 90 nm
L2 cache 2048 KB vs 1024 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 9 Watt vs 65 Watt

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE Intel Core Duo ULV L2400

Essentials

Architecture codename Windsor Yonah
Launch date September 2006 September 2006
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Vertical segment Desktop Laptop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 220 mm 90 mm
L1 cache 256 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 2048 KB
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 65 nm
Maximum frequency 2.6 GHz 1.07 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Transistor count 154 million 151 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM2 479
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 9 Watt

Memory

Supported memory types DDR1

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE with others

AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE AMD
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE
vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 Intel
Core 2 Duo T7400
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE AMD
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE
vs Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 Intel
Core Duo ULV L2400
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE AMD
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE
vs Intel Core Duo LV L2500 Intel
Core Duo LV L2500