AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE vs Intel Core Duo ULV L2400
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE and Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE
- Around 143% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 1.07 GHz
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 1.07 GHz |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Duo ULV L2400
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 7.2x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 65 Watt
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ EE | Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Windsor | Yonah |
| Launch date | September 2006 | September 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 220 mm | 90 mm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 2048 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 1.07 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 154 million | 151 million |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM2 | 479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 9 Watt |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | |