AMD Athlon II X2 240 vs AMD Phenom II X3 705e

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X2 240 and AMD Phenom II X3 705e processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X2 240

  • CPU is newer: launch date 0 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
  • Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1078 vs 962
Specifications (specs)
Launch date July 2009 vs June 2009
Maximum frequency 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
L2 cache 2048 KB vs 512 KB (per core)
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1078 vs 962

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X3 705e

  • 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 2
  • Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1222 vs 1037
  • Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.938 vs 1.699
  • Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7.825 vs 4.009
  • Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.123 vs 0.093
  • Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.578 vs 1.779
Specifications (specs)
Number of cores 3 vs 2
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 1222 vs 1037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.938 vs 1.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7.825 vs 4.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.123 vs 0.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2.578 vs 1.779

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X2 240
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X3 705e

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1078
962
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1037
1222
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.699
1.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
4.009
7.825
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.093
0.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.779
2.578
Name AMD Athlon II X2 240 AMD Phenom II X3 705e
PassMark - Single thread mark 1078 962
PassMark - CPU mark 1037 1222
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 338
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.699 1.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4.009 7.825
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.093 0.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.779 2.578

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Athlon II X2 240 AMD Phenom II X3 705e

Essentials

Architecture codename Regor Heka
Launch date July 2009 June 2009
Launch price (MSRP) $35 $152
Place in performance rating 3099 3093
Price now $15.99 $152.34
Value for money (0-100) 30.24 4.31
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 117 mm 258 mm
L1 cache 256 KB 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 2048 KB 512 KB (per core)
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 45 nm
Maximum frequency 2.8 GHz 2.5 GHz
Number of cores 2 3
Transistor count 410 million 758 million
L3 cache 6144 KB (shared)

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3 DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM3 AM3
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 65 Watt