AMD Athlon II X2 240 vs AMD Phenom II X3 705e
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X2 240 and AMD Phenom II X3 705e processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X2 240
- CPU is newer: launch date 0 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1081 vs 962
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | July 2009 vs June 2009 |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz |
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1081 vs 962 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X3 705e
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 2
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1222 vs 1044
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.938 vs 1.699
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7.825 vs 4.009
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.123 vs 0.093
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.578 vs 1.779
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 3 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1222 vs 1044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.938 vs 1.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.825 vs 4.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.123 vs 0.093 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.578 vs 1.779 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X2 240
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X3 705e
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon II X2 240 | AMD Phenom II X3 705e |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1081 | 962 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1044 | 1222 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 338 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 618 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.699 | 1.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.009 | 7.825 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.093 | 0.123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.779 | 2.578 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon II X2 240 | AMD Phenom II X3 705e | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Regor | Heka |
Launch date | July 2009 | June 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $35 | $152 |
Place in performance rating | 3100 | 3093 |
Price now | $15.99 | $152.34 |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.24 | 4.31 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 117 mm | 258 mm |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 3 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 758 million |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |