AMD Athlon II X2 250 vs AMD Athlon 64 2650e
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X2 250 and AMD Athlon 64 2650e processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X2 250
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 88% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1199 vs 304
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1170 vs 274
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | June 2009 vs January 2009 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 512 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1199 vs 304 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1170 vs 274 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 2650e
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X2 250
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 2650e
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon II X2 250 | AMD Athlon 64 2650e |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1199 | 304 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1170 | 274 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 642 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.343 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.089 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.714 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon II X2 250 | AMD Athlon 64 2650e | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Regor | Lima |
Launch date | June 2009 | January 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39 | |
Place in performance rating | 3204 | 3252 |
Price now | $189.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.70 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 117 mm | 77 mm |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 122 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |