AMD Athlon II X4 620 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X4 620 and Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X4 620
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2019 vs 1124
- Around 77% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1083 vs 612
- 9.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.01 vs 0.322
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.185 vs 0.1
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.384 vs 2.463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | September 2009 vs January 2008 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2019 vs 1124 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1083 vs 612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.01 vs 0.322 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.185 vs 0.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.384 vs 2.463 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 2.67 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1144 vs 1062
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 368 vs 312
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 27.206 vs 8.801
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1144 vs 1062 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 368 vs 312 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 27.206 vs 8.801 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X4 620
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Athlon II X4 620 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1062 | 1144 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2019 | 1124 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 312 | 368 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1083 | 612 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.01 | 0.322 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.801 | 27.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.185 | 0.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.384 | 2.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon II X4 620 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Propus | Wolfdale |
| Launch date | September 2009 | January 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | |
| Place in performance rating | 3091 | 3095 |
| Price now | $69.99 | $49.99 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.37 | 11.13 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | E8200 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 169 mm | 107 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 6144 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 300 million | 410 million |
| Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.4°C | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM3 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Athlon II X4 620 with others
AMDAthlon II X4 620 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E8200
AMDAthlon II X4 620 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E7500
AMDAthlon II X4 620 vs
AMDPhenom II X3 705e
AMDAthlon II X4 620 vs
AMDPhenom II X2 550 BE
AMDAthlon II X4 620 vs
AMDAthlon II X2 240
AMDAthlon II X4 620 vs
IntelPentium E6500
