AMD Athlon XP-M 2200+ vs AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon XP-M 2200+ and AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+
- Around 32% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 1.67 GHz
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz vs 1.67 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 561 vs 559 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 365 vs 364 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon XP-M 2200+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon XP-M 2200+ | AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 559 | 561 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 364 | 365 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon XP-M 2200+ | AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Barton | Barton |
Launch date | January 2001 | January 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 2904 | 2905 |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
Die size | 101 mm | 101 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.67 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 63 million | 63 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | A | A |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |