AMD C-50 vs AMD Turion 64 ML-30
Comparative analysis of AMD C-50 and AMD Turion 64 ML-30 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD C-50
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 35 Watt
Launch date | 9 November 2010 vs March 2005 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Number of threads | 2 vs 1 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 ML-30
- Around 60% higher clock speed: 1.6 GHz vs 1 GHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 314 vs 312
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 277 vs 265
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz vs 1 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 314 vs 312 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 277 vs 265 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD C-50
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 ML-30
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD C-50 | AMD Turion 64 ML-30 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 312 | 314 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 265 | 277 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 85 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.033 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.288 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 150 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1102 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 150 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1102 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD C-50 | AMD Turion 64 ML-30 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Ontario | Lancaster |
Launch date | 9 November 2010 | March 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 3236 | 3230 |
Series | AMD C-Series | Turion 64 |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 75 mm | 125 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Number of threads | 2 | 1 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
Transistor count | 114 million | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | 754 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt | 35 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
PowerNow |