AMD E-240 vs AMD Athlon X2 QL-62

Comparative analysis of AMD E-240 and AMD Athlon X2 QL-62 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E-240

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 3.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 614 vs 181
• Around 63% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 557 vs 342

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 QL-62

• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• Around 33% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 623 vs 403
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 525 vs 195

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E-240
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 QL-62

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	403 623
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	195 525
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	614 181
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	557 342

Compare specifications (specs)