AMD E-300 vs AMD Athlon II Neo K345

Comparative analysis of AMD E-300 and AMD Athlon II Neo K345 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E-300

• CPU is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 45 nm

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II Neo K345

• Around 8% higher clock speed: 1.4 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 18 Watt
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 552 vs 394
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 527 vs 339

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: AMD Athlon II Neo K345

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	394 552
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	339 527

Compare specifications (specs)