AMD E-300 vs AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+

Comparative analysis of AMD E-300 and AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E-300

• CPU is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 130 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 45 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+

• Around 69% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 561 vs 394
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 365 vs 339

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	394 561
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	339 365

Compare specifications (specs)