AMD E-300 vs AMD E-350
Comparative analysis of AMD E-300 and AMD E-350 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E-300
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.83 vs 0.725
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 250 vs 244
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 250 vs 244
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 August 2011 vs 9 November 2010 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.83 vs 0.725 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 250 vs 244 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 250 vs 244 |
Reasons to consider the AMD E-350
- Around 23% higher clock speed: 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 485 vs 394
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 421 vs 339
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 135 vs 104
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 250 vs 186
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.522 vs 0.502
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 887 vs 754
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1798 vs 1461
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 887 vs 754
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1798 vs 1461
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 485 vs 394 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 421 vs 339 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 135 vs 104 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 250 vs 186 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.522 vs 0.502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 887 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1798 vs 1461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 887 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1798 vs 1461 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: AMD E-350
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD E-300 | AMD E-350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 394 | 485 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 339 | 421 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 104 | 135 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 186 | 250 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.502 | 0.522 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.83 | 0.725 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 250 | 244 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | 887 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1461 | 1798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 250 | 244 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 | 887 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1461 | 1798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.036 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.275 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD E-300 | AMD E-350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zacate | Zacate |
Launch date | 22 August 2011 | 9 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 3002 | 3004 |
Series | AMD E-Series | AMD E-Series |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 75 mm | 75 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 18 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |