Intel Atom E3845 vs AMD E-300
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom E3845 and AMD E-300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom E3845
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 47% higher clock speed: 1.91 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 18 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 536 vs 394
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1065 vs 340
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.787 vs 0.502
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | October 2013 vs 22 August 2011 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 1.91 GHz vs 1.3 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 18 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 536 vs 394 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1065 vs 340 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.787 vs 0.502 |
Reasons to consider the AMD E-300
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1461 vs 1041
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1461 vs 1041
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1461 vs 1041 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1461 vs 1041 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom E3845
CPU 2: AMD E-300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom E3845 | AMD E-300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 536 | 394 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1065 | 340 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.495 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1041 | 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1041 | 1461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.787 | 0.502 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 104 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 186 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.83 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 250 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 250 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Atom E3845 | AMD E-300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Zacate |
| Launch date | October 2013 | 22 August 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 3032 | 3002 |
| Processor Number | E3845 | |
| Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor E Series | AMD E-Series |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertical segment | Embedded | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.91 GHz | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | -40°C to 110°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 1.91 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Die size | 75 mm | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 542 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 792 MHz | |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 18 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated IDE | ||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | x4, x2, x1 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0, 3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Atom E3845 with others
IntelAtom E3845 vs
IntelCore i7-720QM
IntelAtom E3845 vs
IntelCore i5-480M
IntelAtom E3845 vs
IntelCeleron 1017U
