AMD E-300 vs AMD E-350
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD E-300 und AMD E-350 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Kompatibilität, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD E-300
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 9 Monat(e) später
- 6.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.83 vs 0.725
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 250 vs 244
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 250 vs 244
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 22 August 2011 vs 9 November 2010 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.83 vs 0.725 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 250 vs 244 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 250 vs 244 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD E-350
- Etwa 23% höhere Taktfrequenz: 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 485 vs 394
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 421 vs 339
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 135 vs 104
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 250 vs 186
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.522 vs 0.502
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 887 vs 754
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1798 vs 1461
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 887 vs 754
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1798 vs 1461
Spezifikationen | |
Maximale Frequenz | 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 485 vs 394 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 421 vs 339 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 135 vs 104 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 250 vs 186 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.522 vs 0.502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 887 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1798 vs 1461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 887 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1798 vs 1461 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: AMD E-350
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD E-300 | AMD E-350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 394 | 485 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 339 | 421 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 104 | 135 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 186 | 250 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.502 | 0.522 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.83 | 0.725 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 250 | 244 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | 887 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1461 | 1798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 250 | 244 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 | 887 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1461 | 1798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.036 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.275 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD E-300 | AMD E-350 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Zacate | Zacate |
Startdatum | 22 August 2011 | 9 November 2010 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 3002 | 3004 |
Serie | AMD E-Series | AMD E-Series |
Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Matrizengröße | 75 mm | 75 mm |
L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Maximale Frequenz | 1.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | 2 |
Speicher |
||
Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
Unterstützte Sockel | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 18 Watt | 18 Watt |
Virtualisierung |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |