AMD E-300 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Comparative analysis of AMD E-300 and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E-300

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 45 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000

• Around 38% higher clock speed: 1.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
• Around 85% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 728 vs 394
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1084 vs 339
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 219 vs 104
• 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 377 vs 186

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	394 728
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	339 1084
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	104 219
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	186 377

Compare specifications (specs)