AMD E-350 vs AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

Comparative analysis of AMD E-350 and AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E-350

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

• Around 38% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 773 vs 487
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 645 vs 425
• 7.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 991 vs 135
• 7.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1806 vs 250

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E-350
CPU 2: AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	487 773
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	425 645
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	135 991
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	250 1806

Compare specifications (specs)