Intel Atom E3845 vs AMD E-350

Comparative analysis of Intel Atom E3845 and AMD E-350 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Atom E3845

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
  • Around 19% higher clock speed: 1.91 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 18 Watt
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 536 vs 485
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1058 vs 421
  • 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 9.495 vs 1.936
  • Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.787 vs 0.522
Specifications (specs)
Launch date October 2013 vs 9 November 2010
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Number of threads 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 1.91 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 40 nm
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) vs 128 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 18 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 536 vs 485
PassMark - CPU mark 1058 vs 421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 9.495 vs 1.936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.787 vs 0.522

Reasons to consider the AMD E-350

  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1798 vs 1041
  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1798 vs 1041
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1798 vs 1041
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1798 vs 1041

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Atom E3845
CPU 2: AMD E-350

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
536
485
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1058
421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
9.495
1.936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1041
1798
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1041
1798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.787
0.522
Name Intel Atom E3845 AMD E-350
PassMark - Single thread mark 536 485
PassMark - CPU mark 1058 421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 9.495 1.936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1041 1798
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1041 1798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.787 0.522
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 135
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 250
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.036
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 0.725
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 244
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 887
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 244
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 887

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Atom E3845 AMD E-350

Essentials

Architecture codename Bay Trail Zacate
Launch date October 2013 9 November 2010
Place in performance rating 2957 2935
Processor Number E3845
Series Intel® Atom™ Processor E Series AMD E-Series
Status Launched
Vertical segment Embedded Laptop

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 1.91 GHz
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) 128 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) 1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 40 nm
Maximum core temperature -40°C to 110°C
Maximum frequency 1.91 GHz 1.6 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Number of threads 4 2
Die size 75 mm

Memory

ECC memory support
Max memory channels 2
Maximum memory size 8 GB
Supported memory types DDR3L 1333 DDR3

Graphics

Graphics base frequency 542 MHz
Graphics max frequency 792 MHz
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics Intel HD Graphics

Graphics interfaces

Number of displays supported 2

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 25mm x 27mm
Sockets supported FCBGA1170 FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 18 Watt

Peripherals

Integrated IDE
Integrated LAN
Max number of PCIe lanes 4
PCI Express revision 2.0
PCIe configurations x4, x2, x1
Total number of SATA ports 2
UART
USB revision 2.0, 3.0

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
HD Audio
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Atom E3845 with others

Intel Atom E3845 Intel
Atom E3845
vs Intel Celeron B800 Intel
Celeron B800
Intel Atom E3845 Intel
Atom E3845
vs Intel Celeron 877 Intel
Celeron 877
Intel Atom E3845 Intel
Atom E3845
vs Intel Celeron 1017U Intel
Celeron 1017U