AMD E-350 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Comparative analysis of AMD E-350 and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E-350
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 45 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
Launch date | 9 November 2010 vs 1 May 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 45 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
- Around 13% higher clock speed: 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 728 vs 485
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1084 vs 421
- Around 62% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 219 vs 135
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 377 vs 250
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 728 vs 485 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1084 vs 421 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 219 vs 135 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 377 vs 250 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E-350
CPU 2: Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD E-350 | Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 485 | 728 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 421 | 1084 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 135 | 219 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 250 | 377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.522 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.036 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.725 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 244 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 887 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1798 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 244 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 887 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1798 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD E-350 | Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zacate | Penryn-1M |
Launch date | 9 November 2010 | 1 May 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 3005 | 3007 |
Series | AMD E-Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 75 mm | 107 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
Transistor count | 410 Million | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Sockets supported | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | P (478) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 35 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |