AMD E1-1200 vs AMD E-240
Comparative analysis of AMD E1-1200 and AMD E-240 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E1-1200
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 431 vs 403
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 381 vs 195
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.454 vs 0.298
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 March 2012 vs 9 November 2010 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Number of threads | 2 vs 1 |
L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 431 vs 403 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 381 vs 195 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.454 vs 0.298 |
Reasons to consider the AMD E-240
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 1.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
- 5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 614 vs 122
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 557 vs 225
- 22.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.462 vs 0.514
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 614 vs 122 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 557 vs 225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.462 vs 0.514 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E1-1200
CPU 2: AMD E-240
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD E1-1200 | AMD E-240 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 431 | 403 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 381 | 195 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 122 | 614 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 225 | 557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.454 | 0.298 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0.514 | 11.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.335 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 199 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1447 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 199 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1447 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD E1-1200 | AMD E-240 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zacate | Zacate |
Launch date | 20 March 2012 | 9 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 3192 | 3181 |
Series | AMD E-Series | AMD E-Series |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 75 mm | 75 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | |
Maximum frequency | 1.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Number of threads | 2 | 1 |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 18 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
PowerNow | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |