AMD E1-1200 vs AMD E-240

Comparative analysis of AMD E1-1200 and AMD E-240 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E1-1200

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
  • 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 431 vs 403
  • Around 95% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 381 vs 195
  • Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.454 vs 0.298
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 20 March 2012 vs 9 November 2010
Number of cores 2 vs 1
Number of threads 2 vs 1
L1 cache 128 KB vs 64 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB vs 512 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 431 vs 403
PassMark - CPU mark 381 vs 195
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.454 vs 0.298

Reasons to consider the AMD E-240

  • Around 7% higher clock speed: 1.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
  • 5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 614 vs 122
  • 2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 557 vs 225
  • 22.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.462 vs 0.514
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 1.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 614 vs 122
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 557 vs 225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 11.462 vs 0.514

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E1-1200
CPU 2: AMD E-240

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
431
403
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
381
195
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
122
614
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
225
557
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.454
0.298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.514
11.462
Name AMD E1-1200 AMD E-240
PassMark - Single thread mark 431 403
PassMark - CPU mark 381 195
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 122 614
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 225 557
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.454 0.298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 0.514 11.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 5.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 199
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 199
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1447

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD E1-1200 AMD E-240

Essentials

Architecture codename Zacate Zacate
Launch date 20 March 2012 9 November 2010
Place in performance rating 3192 3181
Series AMD E-Series AMD E-Series
Vertical segment Laptop Laptop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 75 mm 75 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 64 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 100 °C
Maximum frequency 1.4 GHz 1.5 GHz
Number of cores 2 1
Number of threads 2 1

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3 DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported FT1 BGA 413-Ball FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt 18 Watt

Advanced Technologies

PowerNow

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)