AMD E1-6010 vs AMD Phenom II X4 P920
Comparative analysis of AMD E1-6010 and AMD Phenom II X4 P920 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E1-6010
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.155 vs 1.869
- 13.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 62.055 vs 4.549
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 April 2014 vs 12 May 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.155 vs 1.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 62.055 vs 4.549 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 P920
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 597 vs 426
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1006 vs 536
- 7.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1029 vs 142
- 11.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2866 vs 250
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 1 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 597 vs 426 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1006 vs 536 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1029 vs 142 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2866 vs 250 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E1-6010
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 P920
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD E1-6010 | AMD Phenom II X4 P920 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 426 | 597 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 536 | 1006 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 142 | 1029 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 250 | 2866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.155 | 1.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 62.055 | 4.549 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.689 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 11.178 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 377 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 877 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2018 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 377 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 877 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2018 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD E1-6010 | AMD Phenom II X4 P920 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Beema | Champlain |
Family | AMD E-Series Processors | |
Launch date | 29 April 2014 | 12 May 2010 |
OPN Tray | EM6010IUJ23JB | |
Place in performance rating | 2761 | 2737 |
Series | AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops | 4x AMD Phenom II |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.35 GHz | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2048 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 45 nm |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Unlocked | ||
Front-side bus (FSB) | 3600 MHz | |
L1 cache | 512 KB | |
Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 1 | |
Supported memory types | DDR3L-1333 | |
Graphics |
||
Enduro | ||
Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | |
Switchable graphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
Sockets supported | FT3b | S1 (S1g4) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 25 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
System Image Stability | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |