AMD FX-8300 vs AMD Phenom II X4 920
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8300 and AMD Phenom II X4 920 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8300
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- Around 50% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1496 vs 1130
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 5334 vs 2156
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.817 vs 3.558
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 19.41 vs 7.624
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.397 vs 0.17
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.995 vs 0.322
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.999 vs 3.506
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2012 vs January 2009 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm |
L2 cache | 8 MB vs 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1496 vs 1130 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 5334 vs 2156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.817 vs 3.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.41 vs 7.624 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.397 vs 0.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.995 vs 0.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.999 vs 3.506 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 920
- Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1674 vs 518
- 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 4682 vs 2318
Specifications (specs) | |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 384 KB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1674 vs 518 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4682 vs 2318 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD FX-8300
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 920
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FX-8300 | AMD Phenom II X4 920 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1496 | 1130 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 5334 | 2156 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 518 | 1674 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2318 | 4682 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2697 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.817 | 3.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.41 | 7.624 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.397 | 0.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.995 | 0.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.999 | 3.506 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FX-8300 | AMD Phenom II X4 920 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Vishera | Deneb |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
Launch date | October 2012 | January 2009 |
OPN PIB | FD8300WMHKBOX | |
OPN Tray | FD8300WMW8KHK | |
Place in performance rating | 2547 | 2524 |
Price now | $80.59 | $66.99 |
Series | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors | |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.21 | 14.95 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $90 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.3 GHz | |
Die size | 315 mm | 258 mm |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 6144 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 70.50°C | |
Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Number of threads | 8 | |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V | |
Transistor count | 1200 million | 758 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3+ | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | n / a | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |