AMD GX-210JA vs AMD C-60
Comparative analysis of AMD GX-210JA and AMD C-60 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Memory, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD GX-210JA
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 9 Watt
| Launch date | 23 May 2013 vs 22 August 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 9 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD C-60
- Around 33% higher clock speed: 1.33 GHz vs 1 GHz
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 354 vs 231
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 290 vs 248
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10 vs 2
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10 vs 2
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 1.33 GHz vs 1 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 354 vs 231 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 290 vs 248 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10 vs 2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10 vs 2 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD GX-210JA
CPU 2: AMD C-60
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD GX-210JA | AMD C-60 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 231 | 354 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 248 | 290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2 | 10 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2 | 10 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 108 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 197 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.467 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.102 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.03 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.801 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.487 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 564 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 564 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD GX-210JA | AMD C-60 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Temash | Ontario |
| Launch date | 23 May 2013 | 22 August 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 3320 | 3286 |
| Series | AMD | AMD C-Series |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 1 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Die size | 75 mm | |
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | FT3 BGA | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 9 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
