AMD Opteron X1150 vs AMD Opteron X2150
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron X1150 and AMD Opteron X2150 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X1150
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 22 Watt
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 22 Watt |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Opteron X1150 | AMD Opteron X2150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Kyoto | Kyoto |
Family | AMD Opteron | AMD Opteron |
Launch date | May 2013 | May 2013 |
OPN Tray | OX1150IPJ44HM | OX2150IAJ44HM |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Series | AMD Opteron X1100 Series Processors | AMD Opteron X2100 Series APU |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 70°C | |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory frequency | 800 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FT3 | FT3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 22 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Graphics |
||
Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | |
Processor graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8400 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort |