AMD Opteron X2 290 vs AMD Turion 64 ML-44
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron X2 290 and AMD Turion 64 ML-44 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X2 290
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 17% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
| Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 ML-44
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron X2 290
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 ML-44
| Name | AMD Opteron X2 290 | AMD Turion 64 ML-44 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 469 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Opteron X2 290 | AMD Turion 64 ML-44 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Italy | Lancaster |
| Launch date | January 2006 | January 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 3063 |
| Vertical segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Turion 64 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 233 million | 114 million |
| Die size | 125 mm | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
| Number of threads | 1 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 940 | 754 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| PowerNow | ||
