AMD Opteron X2 290 vs AMD Turion 64 ML-44

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron X2 290 and AMD Turion 64 ML-44 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X2 290

  • 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
  • Around 17% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Number of cores 2 vs 1
Maximum frequency 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 2 vs 1

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 ML-44

  • 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 95 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Opteron X2 290
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 ML-44

Name AMD Opteron X2 290 AMD Turion 64 ML-44
PassMark - Single thread mark 469
PassMark - CPU mark 384

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Opteron X2 290 AMD Turion 64 ML-44

Essentials

Architecture codename Italy Lancaster
Launch date January 2006 January 2006
Place in performance rating not rated 3051
Vertical segment Server Laptop
Series Turion 64

Performance

64 bit support
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 90 nm
Maximum frequency 2.8 GHz 2.4 GHz
Number of cores 2 1
Transistor count 233 million 114 million
Die size 125 mm
Front-side bus (FSB) 800 MHz
Number of threads 1

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 2 1
Sockets supported 940 754
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Advanced Technologies

PowerNow

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare AMD Opteron X2 290 with others

AMD Opteron X2 290 AMD
Opteron X2 290
vs Intel Core Duo LV L2400 Intel
Core Duo LV L2400
AMD Opteron X2 290 AMD
Opteron X2 290
vs Intel Core Duo LV L2300 Intel
Core Duo LV L2300
AMD Opteron X2 290 AMD
Opteron X2 290
vs AMD Turion 64 ML-44 AMD
Turion 64 ML-44