AMD Opteron X2 290 vs AMD Turion 64 ML-44
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron X2 290 and AMD Turion 64 ML-44 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X2 290
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 17% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 ML-44
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron X2 290
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 ML-44
Name | AMD Opteron X2 290 | AMD Turion 64 ML-44 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 469 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Opteron X2 290 | AMD Turion 64 ML-44 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Italy | Lancaster |
Launch date | January 2006 | January 2006 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 3051 |
Vertical segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | Turion 64 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Transistor count | 233 million | 114 million |
Die size | 125 mm | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
Number of threads | 1 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 940 | 754 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
PowerNow |