AMD Opteron X2 875 HE vs AMD Athlon 64 FX-60
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron X2 875 HE and AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X2 875 HE
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 110 Watt
| Launch date | February 2006 vs January 2006 |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 vs 1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 FX-60
- Around 18% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 1024 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron X2 875 HE
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 FX-60
| Name | AMD Opteron X2 875 HE | AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 912 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 709 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Opteron X2 875 HE | AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Egypt | Toledo |
| Launch date | February 2006 | January 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 2430 |
| Vertical segment | Server | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 2048 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 233 million | 233 million |
| Die size | 199 mm | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 940 | 939 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 110 Watt |
