AMD PRO A12-9800E vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B

Comparative analysis of AMD PRO A12-9800E and AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD PRO A12-9800E

  • Around 13% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.35 GHz
  • Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 54 Watt
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1067 vs 1051
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1067 vs 1051
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 3.8 GHz vs 3.35 GHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 54 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1067 vs 1051
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1067 vs 1051

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 39% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2065 vs 1485
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 8172 vs 3094
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2949 vs 922
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3722 vs 3472
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2949 vs 922
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3722 vs 3472
Specifications (specs)
Launch date February 2018 vs 3 October 2016
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 2065 vs 1485
PassMark - CPU mark 8172 vs 3094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2949 vs 922
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3722 vs 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2949 vs 922
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3722 vs 3472

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD PRO A12-9800E
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1485
2065
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
3094
8172
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
922
2949
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1067
1051
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3472
3722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
922
2949
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1067
1051
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3472
3722
Name AMD PRO A12-9800E AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B
PassMark - Single thread mark 1485 2065
PassMark - CPU mark 3094 8172
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 19.25
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 242.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 27.397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 98.209
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 922 2949
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1067 1051
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3472 3722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 922 2949
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1067 1051
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3472 3722

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD PRO A12-9800E AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B

Essentials

Family AMD PRO A-Series Processors
Launch date 3 October 2016 February 2018
OPN Tray AD980BAHM44AB
OS Support Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Place in performance rating 1135 1127
Series AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Architecture codename Zen

Performance

Base frequency 3.1 GHz
L2 cache 2 MB 512 KB (per core)
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Maximum core temperature 90°C
Maximum frequency 3.8 GHz 3.35 GHz
Number of cores 4 4
Number of GPU cores 8
Unlocked
64 bit support
Die size 246 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core)
L3 cache 2048 KB (shared)
Transistor count 4950 million

Memory

Max memory channels 2
Supported memory frequency 2400 MHz
Supported memory types DDR4

Graphics

Enduro
Graphics max frequency 900 MHz
Processor graphics R7
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)

Graphics interfaces

DisplayPort
HDMI

Graphics API support

DirectX 12
Vulkan

Compatibility

Sockets supported AM4
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 54 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1

Peripherals

PCI Express revision 3.0

Advanced Technologies

AMD Secure technology
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
FreeSync
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Out-of-band client management
PowerGating
PowerNow
PowerTune
System Image Stability
TrueAudio

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2.0