AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE vs AMD Phenom X4 9650
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE and AMD Phenom X4 9650 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 39% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1307 vs 908
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 411 vs 283
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.25 vs 0.833
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 9.709 vs 8.403
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | January 2010 vs March 2008 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) vs 2048 KB (shared) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1307 vs 908 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 411 vs 283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.25 vs 0.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.709 vs 8.403 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9650
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1733 vs 1296
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 990 vs 762
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1733 vs 1296 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 990 vs 762 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE
CPU 2: AMD Phenom X4 9650
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE | AMD Phenom X4 9650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1307 | 908 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1296 | 1733 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 411 | 283 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 762 | 990 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.25 | 0.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.709 | 8.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.13 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.213 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.308 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE | AMD Phenom X4 9650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Callisto | Agena |
Launch date | January 2010 | March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 3036 | 3038 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 258 mm | 285 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 2048 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 758 million | 450 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM2+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 95 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |