AMD Phenom II X4 925 vs AMD Phenom II X4 810

Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 925 and AMD Phenom II X4 810 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 925

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
  • Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1150 vs 1034
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2272 vs 1971
  • Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 357 vs 352
  • Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 10.457 vs 7.907
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.197 vs 0.172
Specifications (specs)
Launch date May 2009 vs February 2009
Maximum frequency 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
L3 cache 6144 KB (shared) vs 4096 KB (shared)
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1150 vs 1034
PassMark - CPU mark 2272 vs 1971
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 357 vs 352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 10.457 vs 7.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.197 vs 0.172

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 810

  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1207 vs 1147
  • 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.314 vs 1.088
  • Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.432 vs 3.231
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1207 vs 1147
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.314 vs 1.088
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 3.432 vs 3.231

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 925
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 810

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1150
1034
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
2272
1971
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
357
352
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1147
1207
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.088
3.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
10.457
7.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.197
0.172
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3.231
3.432
Name AMD Phenom II X4 925 AMD Phenom II X4 810
PassMark - Single thread mark 1150 1034
PassMark - CPU mark 2272 1971
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 357 352
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1147 1207
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.088 3.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 10.457 7.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.197 0.172
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 3.231 3.432

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Phenom II X4 925 AMD Phenom II X4 810

Essentials

Architecture codename Deneb Deneb
Launch date May 2009 February 2009
Launch price (MSRP) $160 $116
Place in performance rating 2969 2986
Price now $43.99 $115.99
Value for money (0-100) 22.90 7.94
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 258 mm 258 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) 512 KB (per core)
L3 cache 6144 KB (shared) 4096 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 45 nm
Maximum frequency 2.8 GHz 2.6 GHz
Number of cores 4 4
Transistor count 758 million 758 million

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3 DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM3 AM3
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt 95 Watt