AMD Phenom II X4 925 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 925 and Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 925
- CPU is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2272 vs 1273
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1147 vs 754
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.088 vs 0.344
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.197 vs 0.086
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.231 vs 2.496
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | May 2009 vs August 2008 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2272 vs 1273 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1147 vs 754 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.088 vs 0.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.197 vs 0.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.231 vs 2.496 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
- Around 19% higher clock speed: 3.33 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1321 vs 1150
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 439 vs 357
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 23.046 vs 10.457
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.33 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1321 vs 1150 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 439 vs 357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 23.046 vs 10.457 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 925
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Phenom II X4 925 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1150 | 1321 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2272 | 1273 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 | 439 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1147 | 754 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.088 | 0.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.457 | 23.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.197 | 0.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.231 | 2.496 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Phenom II X4 925 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Deneb | Wolfdale |
| Launch date | May 2009 | August 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2967 | 2937 |
| Price now | $43.99 | $39.99 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.90 | 16.84 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | E8500 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 258 mm | 107 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 6144 KB |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3.33 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 758 million | 410 million |
| Base frequency | 3.16 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.4°C | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM3 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Phenom II X4 925 with others
AMDPhenom II X4 925 vs
AMDAthlon 64 2800+
AMDPhenom II X4 925 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E8400
AMDPhenom II X4 925 vs
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9450
AMDPhenom II X4 925 vs
AMDPhenom II X4 B95
AMDPhenom II X4 925 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 435
AMDPhenom II X4 925 vs
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9505
