AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE vs AMD Athlon X2 7850 BE
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE and AMD Athlon X2 7850 BE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 21% higher clock speed: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.563 vs 1.611
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 13.634 vs 3.841
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.224 vs 0.083
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.457 vs 0.159
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.98 vs 1.833
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | June 2010 vs April 2009 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L1 cache | 512 KB vs 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB vs 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) vs 2048 KB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.563 vs 1.611 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.634 vs 3.841 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.224 vs 0.083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.457 vs 0.159 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.98 vs 1.833 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 7850 BE
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1554 vs 435
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2668 vs 1359
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1554 vs 435 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2668 vs 1359 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 7850 BE
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE | AMD Athlon X2 7850 BE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1302 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2370 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 435 | 1554 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1359 | 2668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.563 | 1.611 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.634 | 3.841 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.224 | 0.083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.457 | 0.159 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.98 | 1.833 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE | AMD Athlon X2 7850 BE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zosma | Kuma |
Family | AMD Phenom | |
Launch date | June 2010 | April 2009 |
OPN PIB | HD96ZTWFGRBOX | |
OPN Tray | HD96ZTWFK4DGR | |
Place in performance rating | 2862 | 2879 |
Series | AMD Phenom II X4 Black | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3 GHz | |
Die size | 346 mm | 285 mm |
L1 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 2048 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 71°C | |
Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | |
Transistor count | 904 million | 450 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM2+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |