AMD Phenom II X6 1035T vs AMD Phenom II X4 920

Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X6 1035T and AMD Phenom II X4 920 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Phenom II X6 1035T

AMD Phenom II X4 920

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1035T

CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1226 vs 1130
Around 39% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3000 vs 2156
Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.836 vs 3.558
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 19.107 vs 7.624
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.388 vs 0.17

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	April 2010 vs January 2009
Number of cores	6 vs 4
L1 cache	128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt vs 125 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	1226 vs 1130
PassMark - CPU mark	3000 vs 2156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.836 vs 3.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	19.107 vs 7.624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.388 vs 0.17

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 920

Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz

Maximum frequency	2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 920

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1226

1130

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

3000

2156

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

5.836

3.558

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

19.107

7.624

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.388

0.17

Name	AMD Phenom II X6 1035T	AMD Phenom II X4 920
PassMark - Single thread mark	1226	1130
PassMark - CPU mark	3000	2156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.836	3.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	19.107	7.624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.388	0.17
Geekbench 4 - Single Core		1674
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core		4682
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		0.322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		3.506

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Phenom II X6 1035T	AMD Phenom II X4 920
Essentials
Architecture codename	Thuban	Deneb
Launch date	April 2010	January 2009
Launch price (MSRP)	$189	$90
Place in performance rating	2522	2524
Price now	$189	$66.99
Value for money (0-100)	7.27	14.95
Vertical segment	Desktop	Desktop
Performance
64 bit support
Die size	346 mm	258 mm
L1 cache	128 KB (per core)	128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	6144 KB (shared)	6144 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology	45 nm	45 nm
Maximum frequency	2.6 GHz	2.8 GHz
Number of cores	6	4
Transistor count	904 million	758 million
Memory
Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Compatibility
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Sockets supported	AM3	AM3
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt	125 Watt