AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE vs AMD Athlon II X4 635
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE and AMD Athlon II X4 635 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- Around 10% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1455 vs 1168
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3770 vs 2237
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 460 vs 357
- Around 75% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1974 vs 1130
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.141 vs 2.875
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.825 vs 13.354
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.312 vs 0.211
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | April 2010 vs January 2010 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1455 vs 1168 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3770 vs 2237 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 460 vs 357 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1974 vs 1130 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.141 vs 2.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.825 vs 13.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.312 vs 0.211 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X4 635
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU 2: AMD Athlon II X4 635
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE | AMD Athlon II X4 635 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1455 | 1168 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3770 | 2237 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 460 | 357 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1974 | 1130 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.141 | 2.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.825 | 13.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.312 | 0.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.606 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.417 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE | AMD Athlon II X4 635 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Thuban | Propus |
Launch date | April 2010 | January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 2815 | 2823 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | |
Price now | $69.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.66 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 346 mm | 169 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 4 |
Transistor count | 904 million | 300 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 95 Watt |