AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs AMD C-50
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE and AMD C-50 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
- Around 230% higher clock speed: 3.3 GHz vs 1 GHz
- 6x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1498 vs 309
- 14.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3899 vs 261
- 6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 509 vs 85
- 14.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2230 vs 158
- 10.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.711 vs 0.444
- 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.192 vs 2.303
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.182 vs 4.042
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of cores | 6 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.3 GHz vs 1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1498 vs 309 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3899 vs 261 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 509 vs 85 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2230 vs 158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.711 vs 0.444 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.192 vs 2.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.182 vs 4.042 |
Reasons to consider the AMD C-50
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 45 nm
- 13.9x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 125 Watt
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
CPU 2: AMD C-50
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE | AMD C-50 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1498 | 309 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3899 | 261 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 509 | 85 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2230 | 158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.711 | 0.444 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.192 | 2.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.182 | 4.042 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.033 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.288 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 150 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 478 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1102 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 150 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 478 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1102 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE | AMD C-50 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Thuban | Ontario |
| Launch date | December 2010 | 9 November 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 2712 | 3237 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD C-Series | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 346 mm | 75 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3.3 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 904 million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Number of threads | 2 | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM3 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 9 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE with others
AMDPhenom II X6 1100T BE vs
IntelPentium E5300
AMDPhenom II X6 1100T BE vs
IntelCore i7-860
AMDPhenom II X6 1100T BE vs
IntelCore i3-560
AMDPhenom II X6 1100T BE vs
AMDPhenom II X4 970 BE
AMDPhenom II X6 1100T BE vs
AMDPhenom II X4 840T
AMDPhenom II X6 1100T BE vs
AMDFX-6200
