AMD Ryzen 5 2500U vs AMD A10-5757M

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U and AMD A10-5757M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

• CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
• Around 3% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1821 vs 1097
• 3.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6548 vs 1932
• Around 81% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 661 vs 365
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2341 vs 901
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.657 vs 2.665
• 28.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 270.96 vs 9.416
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 vs 0.561
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.115 vs 13.138
• 40.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 88.733 vs 2.213

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5757M

• Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 987 vs 638
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2108 vs 925
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7817 vs 2240
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 987 vs 638
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2108 vs 925
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7817 vs 2240

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
CPU 2: AMD A10-5757M

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1821 1097
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	6548 1932
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	661 365
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	2341 901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	4.657 2.665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	270.96 9.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	1.872 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	24.115 13.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	88.733 2.213
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	638 987
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	925 2108
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	2240 7817
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	638 987
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	925 2108
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	2240 7817

Compare specifications (specs)