AMD Ryzen 5 2500U vs AMD PRO A8-9600B
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U and AMD PRO A8-9600B processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
- Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 90°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1822 vs 1277
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6549 vs 2385
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 661 vs 427
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2341 vs 1128
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 270.96 vs 231.224
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 vs 1.117
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.115 vs 19.579
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 88.733 vs 57.356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 October 2017 vs 10/24/2016 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 90°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1822 vs 1277 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6549 vs 2385 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 661 vs 427 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2341 vs 1128 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270.96 vs 231.224 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 vs 1.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 vs 19.579 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 vs 57.356 |
Reasons to consider the AMD PRO A8-9600B
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.973 vs 4.657
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.973 vs 4.657 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
CPU 2: AMD PRO A8-9600B
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | AMD PRO A8-9600B |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1822 | 1277 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6549 | 2385 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 661 | 427 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2341 | 1128 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.657 | 12.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270.96 | 231.224 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | 1.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 | 19.579 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 | 57.356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 638 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 925 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2240 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 638 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 925 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2240 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | AMD PRO A8-9600B | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zen | Bristol Ridge |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
| Launch date | 26 October 2017 | 10/24/2016 |
| OPN Tray | YM2500C4T4MFB | AM960BADY44AB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Place in performance rating | 1400 | 1387 |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Laptops |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Die size | 246 mm | 250 mm |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 90°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 4500 Million | 3100 Million |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics max frequency | 1100 MHz | 720 MHz |
| iGPU core count | 8 | 6 |
| Processor graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | R5 |
| Enduro | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-25 Watt | 12 Watt/15 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Sockets supported | FP5 | FP4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Not included | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 8 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
| Video Core Next (VCN) | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with others
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
AMDA10-5757M
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
IntelCore i7-4770TE
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
AMDA8-7200P
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
IntelCore i7-8665UE
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1404I
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
IntelCore i3-9100TE
