AMD Ryzen 5 2500U vs AMD PRO A8-9600B
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Ryzen 5 2500U und AMD PRO A8-9600B Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- 4 Mehr Kanäle: 8 vs 4
- Etwa 9% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
- Etwa 6% höhere Kerntemperatur: 95°C vs 90°C
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Etwa 57% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1807 vs 1153
- 3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 6513 vs 2203
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 661 vs 427
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2341 vs 1128
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 270.96 vs 231.224
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 vs 1.117
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.115 vs 19.579
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 88.733 vs 57.356
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 26 October 2017 vs 10/24/2016 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 95°C vs 90°C |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1807 vs 1153 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6513 vs 2203 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 661 vs 427 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2341 vs 1128 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270.96 vs 231.224 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 vs 1.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 vs 19.579 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 vs 57.356 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A8-9600B
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.973 vs 4.657
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.973 vs 4.657 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
CPU 2: AMD PRO A8-9600B
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | AMD PRO A8-9600B |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1807 | 1153 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6513 | 2203 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 661 | 427 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2341 | 1128 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.657 | 12.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270.96 | 231.224 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | 1.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 | 19.579 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 | 57.356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 638 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 925 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2240 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 638 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 925 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2240 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | AMD PRO A8-9600B | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Zen | Bristol Ridge |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | 26 October 2017 | 10/24/2016 |
| OPN Tray | YM2500C4T4MFB | AM960BADY44AB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1475 | 1483 |
| Serie | AMD Ryzen 5 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Laptops |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Basistaktfrequenz | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Matrizengröße | 246 mm | 250 mm |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 95°C | 90°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 4500 Million | 3100 Million |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Unterstützte Speicherfrequenz | 2400 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Grafik |
||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1100 MHz | 720 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 8 | 6 |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | R5 |
| Enduro | ||
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-25 Watt | 12 Watt/15 Watt |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP5 | FP4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Not included | |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 8 | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
| Video Core Next (VCN) | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
