AMD Ryzen 5 2500U versus AMD PRO A8-9600B
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD Ryzen 5 2500U et AMD PRO A8-9600B pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 4 plus de fils: 8 versus 4
- Environ 9% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.6 GHz versus 3.3 GHz
- Environ 6% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 95°C versus 90°C
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1818 versus 1194
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 6542 versus 2292
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 661 versus 427
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2341 versus 1128
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 270.96 versus 231.224
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 versus 1.117
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.115 versus 19.579
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 88.733 versus 57.356
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 26 October 2017 versus 10/24/2016 |
Nombre de fils | 8 versus 4 |
Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz versus 3.3 GHz |
Température de noyau maximale | 95°C versus 90°C |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1818 versus 1194 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6542 versus 2292 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 661 versus 427 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2341 versus 1128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270.96 versus 231.224 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 versus 1.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 versus 19.579 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 versus 57.356 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A8-9600B
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.973 versus 4.657
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.973 versus 4.657 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
CPU 2: AMD PRO A8-9600B
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | AMD PRO A8-9600B |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1818 | 1194 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6542 | 2292 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 661 | 427 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2341 | 1128 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.657 | 12.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270.96 | 231.224 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | 1.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 | 19.579 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 | 57.356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 925 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2240 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 925 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2240 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | AMD PRO A8-9600B | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Zen | Bristol Ridge |
Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
Date de sortie | 26 October 2017 | 10/24/2016 |
OPN Tray | YM2500C4T4MFB | AM960BADY44AB |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1466 | 1475 |
Série | AMD Ryzen 5 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Laptops |
Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Taille de dé | 246 mm | 250 mm |
Cache L1 | 384 KB | |
Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Cache L3 | 4 MB | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 95°C | 90°C |
Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | 6 |
Nombre de fils | 8 | 4 |
Compte de transistor | 4500 Million | 3100 Million |
Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphiques |
||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1100 MHz | 720 MHz |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 8 | 6 |
Graphiques du processeur | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | R5 |
Enduro | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP | 12-25 Watt | 12 Watt/15 Watt |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Prise courants soutenu | FP5 | FP4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Not included | |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 8 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD SenseMI | ||
FreeSync | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
Video Core Next (VCN) | ||
AMD Secure technology | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
PowerTune | ||
RAID | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |