AMD Ryzen 5 2500U vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U and AMD Ryzen 3 2200U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1807 vs 1679
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6513 vs 3686
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 661 vs 631
- Around 61% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2341 vs 1452
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 270.96 vs 160.087
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 vs 0.837
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.115 vs 7.556
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 88.733 vs 54.749
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1807 vs 1679 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6513 vs 3686 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 661 vs 631 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2341 vs 1452 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270.96 vs 160.087 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 vs 0.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 vs 7.556 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 vs 54.749 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.839 vs 4.657
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1238 vs 638
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1683 vs 925
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4877 vs 2240
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1238 vs 638
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1683 vs 925
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4877 vs 2240
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 January 2018 vs 26 October 2017 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.839 vs 4.657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1238 vs 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1683 vs 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4877 vs 2240 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1238 vs 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1683 vs 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4877 vs 2240 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | AMD Ryzen 3 2200U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1807 | 1679 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6513 | 3686 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 661 | 631 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2341 | 1452 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.657 | 10.839 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270.96 | 160.087 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | 0.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 | 7.556 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 | 54.749 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 638 | 1238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 925 | 1683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2240 | 4877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 638 | 1238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 925 | 1683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2240 | 4877 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zen | Zen |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
| Launch date | 26 October 2017 | 8 January 2018 |
| OPN Tray | YM2500C4T4MFB | YM2200C4T2OFB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Place in performance rating | 1475 | 1437 |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 3 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Die size | 246 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 95°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 3 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 4500 Million | 4500 Million |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics max frequency | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| iGPU core count | 8 | 3 |
| Processor graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 Graphics |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-25 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | FP5 | FP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Not included | Not included |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
| Video Core Next (VCN) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with others
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
IntelCore i7-4770TE
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
AMDA8-7200P
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
AMDPRO A8-9600B
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
AMDAthlon Gold 3150U
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
IntelCore i3-9100TE
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
IntelXeon E-2276ME
