AMD Ryzen 5 2500U versus AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD Ryzen 5 2500U et AMD Ryzen 3 2200U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- 4 plus de fils: 8 versus 4
- Environ 6% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.6 GHz versus 3.4 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1823 versus 1679
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 6552 versus 3700
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 661 versus 631
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2341 versus 1452
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 270.96 versus 160.087
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 versus 0.837
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.115 versus 7.556
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 88.733 versus 54.749
Caractéristiques | |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
Nombre de fils | 8 versus 4 |
Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz versus 3.4 GHz |
Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 1 MB |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1823 versus 1679 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6552 versus 3700 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 661 versus 631 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2341 versus 1452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270.96 versus 160.087 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 versus 0.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 versus 7.556 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 versus 54.749 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.839 versus 4.657
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1238 versus 638
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1683 versus 925
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4877 versus 2240
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1238 versus 638
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1683 versus 925
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4877 versus 2240
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 8 January 2018 versus 26 October 2017 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.839 versus 4.657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1238 versus 638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1683 versus 925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4877 versus 2240 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1238 versus 638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1683 versus 925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4877 versus 2240 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | AMD Ryzen 3 2200U |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1823 | 1679 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6552 | 3700 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 661 | 631 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2341 | 1452 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.657 | 10.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270.96 | 160.087 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | 0.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 | 7.556 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 | 54.749 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 638 | 1238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 925 | 1683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2240 | 4877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 638 | 1238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 925 | 1683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2240 | 4877 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Zen | Zen |
Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
Date de sortie | 26 October 2017 | 8 January 2018 |
OPN Tray | YM2500C4T4MFB | YM2200C4T2OFB |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1400 | 1366 |
Série | AMD Ryzen 5 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 3 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Taille de dé | 246 mm | 246 mm |
Cache L1 | 384 KB | 384 KB |
Cache L2 | 2 MB | 1 MB |
Cache L3 | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 95°C | 95°C |
Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | 3 |
Nombre de fils | 8 | 4 |
Compte de transistor | 4500 Million | 4500 Million |
Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphiques |
||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 8 | 3 |
Graphiques du processeur | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 Graphics |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP | 12-25 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Prise courants soutenu | FP5 | FP5 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Not included | Not included |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD SenseMI | ||
FreeSync | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
Video Core Next (VCN) | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |