AMD Ryzen 5 2500U vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Ryzen 5 2500U und AMD Ryzen 3 2200U Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- 2 mehr Kerne, mehr Anwendungen auf einmal ausführen: 4 vs 2
- 4 Mehr Kanäle: 8 vs 4
- Etwa 6% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1823 vs 1679
- Etwa 77% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 6552 vs 3700
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 661 vs 631
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2341 vs 1452
- Etwa 69% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 270.96 vs 160.087
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 vs 0.837
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.115 vs 7.556
- Etwa 62% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 88.733 vs 54.749
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 vs 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1823 vs 1679 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6552 vs 3700 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 661 vs 631 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2341 vs 1452 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270.96 vs 160.087 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 vs 0.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 vs 7.556 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 vs 54.749 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.839 vs 4.657
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1238 vs 638
- Etwa 82% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1683 vs 925
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4877 vs 2240
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1238 vs 638
- Etwa 82% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1683 vs 925
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4877 vs 2240
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 8 January 2018 vs 26 October 2017 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.839 vs 4.657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1238 vs 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1683 vs 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4877 vs 2240 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1238 vs 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1683 vs 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4877 vs 2240 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | AMD Ryzen 3 2200U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1823 | 1679 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6552 | 3700 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 661 | 631 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2341 | 1452 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.657 | 10.839 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270.96 | 160.087 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | 0.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 | 7.556 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 | 54.749 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 638 | 1238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 925 | 1683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2240 | 4877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 638 | 1238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 925 | 1683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2240 | 4877 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Zen | Zen |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
| Startdatum | 26 October 2017 | 8 January 2018 |
| OPN Tray | YM2500C4T4MFB | YM2200C4T2OFB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1401 | 1366 |
| Serie | AMD Ryzen 5 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 3 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Matrizengröße | 246 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 95°C | 95°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 3 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 4500 Million | 4500 Million |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Grafik |
||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 8 | 3 |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 Graphics |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-25 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP5 | FP5 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Not included | Not included |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
| Video Core Next (VCN) | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD Ryzen 5 2500U mit anderen
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
AMDA10-5757M
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
IntelCore i7-4770TE
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
AMDA8-7200P
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
IntelXeon E5-2648L v4
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
IntelCore i5-6442EQ
AMDRyzen 5 2500U vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1404I
